This work is accessible only to Andrews University faculty, staff, and students. Off-Campus Andrews University users should click the "Off-Campus Download" button below, then enter your Andrews University username and password when prompted.
Manuscript Type
Article
Abstract (For book reviews see instructions below)
of Daniel 11 are at least partially due to the ambiguities of the anaphoric references in the chapter. This study attempts to clarify some of the ambiguities by applying de Regt’s rules for the identification of anaphoric references. The author does not present his own interpretation of the chapter but offers brief observations on some current Adventist interpretations.
Recommended Citation
Li, Tarsee.
"Observations on Current Adventist Interpretations of Daniel 11."
Andrews University Seminary Studies (AUSS)
61.2
(2023):
.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/auss/vol61/iss2/4
