Mathematics Professors’ Evaluation of Students’ Proofs: A Complex Teaching Practice

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2016

Keywords

Undergraduate mathematics, Proof evaluation, Proof grading, Proof writing, Teaching proof, Mathematics professors, Practice of mathematicians

Abstract

This article reports on an exploratory study of mathematics professors’ proof evaluation practices and the characteristics they value in good proof writing. Four mathematicianswereinterviewedtwice.Inthefirstinterview,theyevaluatedandscored six proofs of elementary theorems written by undergraduate students in a discrete mathematics or geometry course, assigned each proof a score out of 10 points, and responded to questions about the characteristics they value in a well-written proof and how they communicate these characteristics to students. In the second interview, they reevaluated three of the earlier proofs after reading the marks and comments written by the other professors, and evaluated and scored a seventh proof. The results reveal that proof grading is a complex teaching practice requiring difficult judgments about the seriousnessoferrorsandthestudent’scognitionthatledtoerrorsorotherflaws.Forfive ofthesevenproofsthescoresvariedbyatleast3points,andthearticlediscussesreasons for this variation. These professors agreed that the most important characteristics of a well-written proof are logical correctness, clarity, fluency, and demonstration of understanding of the proof. Although the professors differed in the attention they gave to fluency issues, such as mathematical notation, layout, grammar, and punctuation, they agreed in giving these characteristics little weight in the overall score.

Journal Title

International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education

Volume

2

Issue

2

First Page

246

Last Page

278

First Department

Mathematics

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS