Moral Reasoning about Ending Life Revisited: Influences of Religiosity and Resilience

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2017

Keywords

Religion, End of life issues

Abstract

This study examined religiosity, resilience, and age across generation as predictors of moral reasoning and judgments about certain ending of life situations: suicide, physician-assisted suicide (PAS), active euthanasia (AE), and mercy killing (MK). Data was collected from undergraduate students attending a conservative Christian university in the Midwest as well as from an online community forum (N= 153). This study is a replication and expansion of a previous study.1 Measures included the questionnaire developed for Anstee's study, as well as the Christian Religious Internalization Scale, Response to Stressful Experiences Scale, and a demographic questionnaire. Linear regression analysis found identified (autonomous) religiosity as a predictor of moral reasoning and judgments, to the extent that ending of life scenarios are morally wrong. Resilience was found to be a predictor of moral judgments to the extent that MK is morally right. These findings suggest that the internalization of beliefs plays a considerable role in moral reasoning and judgments about ending of life issues. Understanding the role of mechanisms behind moral reasoning on ending of life issues is increasingly relevant as legislation is currently changing.

Journal Title

Michigan Academician

Volume

44

Issue

3

First Page

239

Last Page

255

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7245/0026-2005-44.3.239

First Department

Behavioral Sciences

Link to Full Text

@ the James White Library

Share

COinS