Authors

Thomas Li-Ping Tang, Middle Tennessee State UniversityFollow
Zhen Li, Texas Woman's UniversityFollow
Mehmet Ferhat Özbek, Gümüşhane ÜniversitesiFollow
Vivien K. G. Lim, National University of SingaporeFollow
Thompson S. H. Teo, National University of SingaporeFollow
Mahfooz A. Ansari, University of LethbridgeFollow
Toto Sutarso, Middle Tennessee State UniversityFollow
Ilya Garber, Saratov State UniversityFollow
Randy Ki-Kwan Chiu, Hong Kong Baptist UniversityFollow
Brigitte Charles-Pauvers, Nantes UniversitéFollow
Caroline Urbain, Nantes UniversitéFollow
Roberto Luna-Arocas, Universitat de ValènciaFollow
Jingqiu Chen, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityFollow
Ningyu Tang, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityFollow
Theresa Li-Na Tang, Tang Global Consulting GroupFollow
Fernando Arias-Galicia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MorelosFollow
Consuelo Garcia De La Torre, Tecnológico de MonterreyFollow
Peter Vlerick, Universiteit GentFollow
Adebowale Akande, IR GLOBE Cross-Cul
Abdulqawi Salim Al-Zubaidi, Sana'a University
Ali Mahdi Kazem, Sultan Qaboos UniversityFollow
Mark G. Borg, L-Università ta' MaltaFollow
Bor-Shiuan Cheng, National Taiwan UniversityFollow
Linzhi Du, Lanzhou University
Abdul Hamid Safwat Ibrahim, Suez Canal UniversityFollow
Kilsun Kim, Sogang UniversityFollow
Eva Malovics, Szegedi Tudományegyetem (SZTE)Follow
Richard T. Mpoyi, Middle Tennessee State UniversityFollow
Obiajulu Anthony Ugochukwu Nnedum, Nnamdi Azikiwe UniversityFollow
Elisaveta Gjorgji Sardžoska, SS Cyril and Methodius University
Michael W. Allen, Ipek ÜniversitesiFollow
Rosário Correia, Politécnico de LisboaFollow
Chin-Kang Jen, National Sun Yat-Sen UniversityFollow
Alice S. Moreira, Universidade Federal do ParáFollow
Johnston E. Osagie, Florida A&M UniversityFollow
AAhad M. Osman-Gani, International Islamic University MalaysiaFollow
Ruja Pholsward, Rangsit University
Marko Polic, University of LjubljanaFollow
Petar Skobic, Club 500 Real Estate Network, LLCFollow
Allen F. Stembridge, Andrews UniversityFollow
Luigina Canova, University of PaduaFollow
Anna Maria Manganelli, University of PaduaFollow
Adrian H. Pitariu, University of ReginaFollow
Francisco José Costa Pereira, Universidade Lusófona

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-21-2023

Keywords

cross-level analysis, measurement invariance, common method variance, dishonesty, corruption, wrongdoing, unethicality, greedy desires, avaricious monetary aspiration, love of money attitude, monetary wisdom, international, global, cross-cultural, pay satisfaction-dissatisfaction, gains-losses, justice, equity perceptions, Level 1, prospect theory, risk-taking, risk-aversion, the certainty effect, the possibility effect, S Curve, behavioral economics, theory of planned behavior, TPB, attitude, social norms, control, intention, transparency, high-low probability of risk, CPI, environmental context, country level, Level 2

Abstract

Corruption involves greed, money, and risky decision-making. We explore the love of money, pay satisfaction, probability of risk, and dishonesty across cultures. Avaricious monetary aspiration breeds unethicality. Prospect theory frames decisions in the gains-losses domain and high-low probability. Pay dissatisfaction (in the losses domain) incites dishonesty in the name of justice at the individual level. The Corruption Perceptions Index, CPI, signals a high-low probability of getting caught for dishonesty at the country level. We theorize that decision-makers adopt avaricious love-of-money aspiration as a lens and frame dishonesty in the gains-losses domain (pay satisfaction-dissatisfaction, Level 1) and high-low probability (CPI, Level 2) to maximize expected utility and ultimate serenity. We challenge the myth: Pay satisfaction mitigates dishonesty across nations consistently. Based on 6500 managers in 32 countries, our cross-level three-dimensional visualization offers the following discoveries. Under high aspiration conditions, pay dissatisfaction excites the highest- (third-highest) avaricious justice-seeking dishonesty in high (medium) CPI nations, supporting the certainty effect. However, pay satisfaction provokes the second-highest avaricious opportunity-seizing dishonesty in low CPI entities, sustaining the possibility effect—maximizing expected utility. Under low aspiration conditions, high pay satisfaction consistently leads to low dishonesty, demonstrating risk aversion—achieving ultimate serenity. We expand prospect theory from a micro and individual-level theory to a cross-level theory of monetary wisdom across 32 nations. We enhance the S-shaped Curve to three 3-D corruption surfaces across three levels of the global economic pyramid, providing novel insights into behavioral economics, business ethics, the environment, and responsibility.

Journal Title

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility

Volume

32

Issue

3

First Page

925

Last Page

945

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12505

First Department

School of Business Administration

Acknowledgements

Retrieved via Open Access from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12505

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS