Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
9-16-2013
Abstract
In any channel operating at 2 Gbps and above, conductor and dielectric losses can dominate channel performance. These effects must be included in any accurate system simulation. The problem isn't that simulators don't do this; there are several choices in interconnect loss mathematical expressions and it's difficult to decide how to transform fab information into simulator input. There are different combinations of parameterized mathematical expressions for dielectric and conductor loss which are in popular use in the industry. Each works to some extent. This paper takes each mathematical expression, explains its origin, evaluates its predicted insertion loss magnitude and phase then explores how the expression scales. This is useful when translating test coupon results into accurate simulation predictions.
Journal Title
DesignCon 2013: Where Chipheads Connect
Volume
1
First Page
469
Last Page
494
ISBN
9781627484725
First Department
Engineering
Recommended Citation
Bogatin, Eric; DeGroot, Don; Huray, Paul G.; and Shlepnev, Yuriy, "Which One is Better? Comparing Options to Describe Frequency Dependent Losses" (2013). Faculty Publications. 1665.
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs/1665
Acknowledgements
Retrieved February 2, 2021 from https://www.ccnlabs.com/uploads/5/5/1/0/55102705/tn20130130_lossmodels_designcon2013_5-wa4.pdf