Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-18-2020
Keywords
Hermeneutics, Pentateuch, Graf-Wellhausen, Old Testament, Historical-Critical method
Abstract
The study of the composition of the Pentateuch has been at the center of critical scholarship since the nineteenth century. While there is general agreement that the Graf-Wellhausen documentary hypothesis, as originally presented, is untenable, most of current Pentateuchal research has worked within the framework of the existence of divergent sources that underwent a number of editorial changes. Considering the basic physical law of input determining output, this study challenges the basic presupposition of the existence of divergent sources and calls for a fresh approach to the hermeneutics of the Pentateuch that approaches the biblical text on its own terms and that does not a priori negate the notion of inspiration, thus challenging the philosophical and methodological presuppositions of standard historical-critical scholarship. As a starting point for this new conversation, it offers seven thesis statements focusing on basic hermeneutics as well as promising methodological approaches that may point this important discussion beyond the well-worn tracks of critical scholarship.
Journal Title
DavarLogos
Volume
18
Issue
2
First Page
1
Last Page
30
First Department
Old Testament
Recommended Citation
Klingbeil, Gerald A., "Of Pillars and Foundations: Seven Thesis Statements Concerning the Hermeneutics of the Pentateuch" (2020). Faculty Publications. 1340.
https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs/1340
Acknowledgements
Retrieved 8/26/2020 from http://publicaciones.uap.edu.ar/index.php/davarlogos/article/view/912
Comments
Derechos de autor 2020 DavarLogos
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.