F-1 God’s Moral Government of Love: The Theological Background of the Civil War
Presenter Status
Department of Church History
Location
Buller Room 208
Start Date
31-10-2014 3:00 PM
End Date
31-10-2014 3:15 PM
Presentation Abstract
The role of religion in the lead up to the U.S. Civil War is a contested topic, with many pointing to a secularized rights movement is being the primary motive for abolition. But this paper will show that the “arminianization” of American theology that led to the Second Great Awakening was not primarily a result of the secular enlightenment, but rather was largely a Biblically-conservative development flowing from roots deep within the Protestant theological heritage, going back to Arminius, and even earlier. Rather than a failure of Evangelical thought, as proposed by some, the Civil War represents the culmination of the moral teaching of this tradition. Rare is it in the history of the world where a nation has undertaken the sacrifice and suffering of a major war over the question of the moral treatment of an internal minority. But conceptions of God as a moral governor, who sits in judgment on the moral behavior of both people and nations, helped provide the popular impetus to support an extend a costly war effort in pursuit of a moral cause.
F-1 God’s Moral Government of Love: The Theological Background of the Civil War
Buller Room 208
The role of religion in the lead up to the U.S. Civil War is a contested topic, with many pointing to a secularized rights movement is being the primary motive for abolition. But this paper will show that the “arminianization” of American theology that led to the Second Great Awakening was not primarily a result of the secular enlightenment, but rather was largely a Biblically-conservative development flowing from roots deep within the Protestant theological heritage, going back to Arminius, and even earlier. Rather than a failure of Evangelical thought, as proposed by some, the Civil War represents the culmination of the moral teaching of this tradition. Rare is it in the history of the world where a nation has undertaken the sacrifice and suffering of a major war over the question of the moral treatment of an internal minority. But conceptions of God as a moral governor, who sits in judgment on the moral behavior of both people and nations, helped provide the popular impetus to support an extend a costly war effort in pursuit of a moral cause.