Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the
good news of the kingdom, and healing every disease and sickness among the
people. Matthew 4:23 (NIV)
Jesus went throughout Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the
good news of the kingdom, and healing every disease and sickness among the
people. Matthew 4:23 (NIV)
Healing touches in the Bible hold significant meaning in both the spiritual and
physical contexts. Numerous biblical accounts illustrate how physical healing in
connection with touch served as a demonstration of faith, connection, and divine
power. These narratives depict important moments in which touch becomes a
conduit for divine healing and emphasize the prominent role that touch plays in
biblical accounts of healing.
This paper first explores the concept of health and healing as presented in
Scripture, followed by an examination of touch and healing in both the Old and
New Testaments, while looking at the cultural, theological, and missiological
perspectives. It posits that healing in the Bible is a multifaceted phenomenon,
encompassing physical, emotional, and spiritual restoration. Additionally, the
paper highlights that “healing touches” are central themes in biblical
narratives, reflecting their significance across various cultures. This analysis
promotes a deeper missiological understanding of the biblical notion of “healing
touch,” in which touch transcends a mere physical action to become a profound
expression of God’s compassion and healing, thus underscoring its spiritual
importance.
Health, healing, and wholeness occupy a central place within the biblical
narrative, embodying God’s intent for the flourishing of the entirety of his
creation. Grounded in the concept of shalom, Scripture articulates a holistic
understanding of wellbeing that encompasses spiritual, physical, emotional,
moral, and relational dimensions. These dimensions are interconnected, each
influencing and shaping the others. In the context of an increasingly fragmented
world, the biblical concept of shalom offers a firm framework for addressing the
multifaceted challenges of health, healing, and wholeness. By embracing the
holistic vision of health, healing, and wholeness, Christians are called to
participate in God’s redemptive mission, fostering hope and restoration in a
world marked by brokenness.
Though “blameless and upright” (Job 1:8), Job’s epic losses and pain exceed our
human ability to imagine. The Apostle Paul’s sufferings nearly killed him
several times (see II Cor 11:23-28, 12:7-10). Christ’s pain on the cross is
incomprehensible. Other biblical notables suffered mentally and/ or emotionally:
Jacob, Hannah, Saul, David, Elijah, Jeremiah, Daniel, and unnamed others whose
maladies were healed by Jesus. But those records seem remote—in the distant
past, so when you feel pain and your suffering lasts and lasts, blurring days
into nights and making routine tasks difficult, what are you to do? Even brief
shocks of pain hurt; memory of the experience is not easily forgotten.
Does the Bible offer any analgesic texts that function like aspirin to ease
migraine headaches? Or has God simply left humans to “grin and bear it” as a
curse of sin? This brief article summarizes the impact of pain and suffering on
humans; in particular, Christians, and offers responses to this aspect of life.
The earthly life and ministry of Jesus Christ was the full incarnation of his
divine identity and mission. However, certain events and situations became
windows that allowed his relationship with his Father and his divine mission to
be revealed with clarity to those around him. In particular, Jesus saw in the
Sabbath a unique and regular opportunity to reveal both his identity and his
mission. Likewise, his opponents understood, with almost surprising accuracy and
clarity, what he was communicating about himself from his religiously
non-conforming actions on Sabbath. However, this was not just a minor ethical
scuffle between a well-studied Jesus and some slightly ignorant teachers of the
law. Jesus was contending against forces that were actively misrepresenting God.
In short, the healing ministry that the Gospels record Jesus performing on
Sabbath sheds much light on both Christology and missiology and is a conscious
effort to dispel the darkness that had accumulated with regards to the character
and work of God.
If it is true, though, that our Christology should inform our missiology and
ecclesiology, then the question arises as to whether there is any
ecclesiological meaning in Jesus’ Sabbath miracles that would guide our vision
and realization of a biblically true and culturally relevant ecclesiology in the
21st century. Since the church is now the body of Jesus, which is spiritually
animated by the one and same Holy Spirit to carry out even greater works of the
same fundamental nature, it would be natural to assume that Jesus’ Sabbath
healings provide ecclesiological precedents for us today in an embryonic form.
Seventh-day Adventists are not usually known for taking authority over sickness
or taking a person by the hand and saying, “In the Name of Jesus of Nazareth,
arise and walk.” And rightly so, for Adventists have been counseled that when
praying for the sick “our prayers must take the form, not of command, but of
intercession” (White 1942:230, 1915:218). Why, because only God knows what is
right and best (White 1948:148, 149). In addition, Ellen White warns against
prayers that insist on God doing what people think needs to happen (1948:148)
and suggests that God’s people should only pray for God’s will to be done
(1915:217). However, Jesus, the disciples and the practices in the Early Church
were much more direct in their interaction with sick people. Jesus said to the
paralyzed man, “Stand up, pick up your mat, and go home” (Mark 2:11, NLT). There
was no statement about if it was God’s will, for Jesus knew what God’s will was
in that situation. When a man with leprosy approached Jesus and said, “Lord . .
. if you are willing, you can heal me and make me clean,” Jesus responded by
reaching out and touching him and saying, “I am willing . . . . Be healed! And
instantly the leprosy disappeared” (Matt 8:2b, 3). Again, no request for God to
heal, rather a direct command.
This article comes from the perspective of a researcher, a practical theologian,
and a missiologist. The title The Missing Blue refers to the idea that light
consists of three colors (Green, Red, Blue), and because God is light, the
analogy of light is relevant for those who believe in the Triune God. We are
called to worship the Creator God (represented by the green color) as Ruler of
all the universe, God the consuming fire (Deut 4:24; Heb 12:29). Jesus
(represented by the red color) teaches us to come to God as our friend, our
daddy (John 15:15; Mark 14:36; Rom 8:15; Gal 4:6). The Holy Spirit (represented
by the blue color) has been sent to us to be in us (Acts 1:8; Rom 8:9; 1Cor
3:16; 6:19).
How do we grow to experience God in all his fullness? How can our mission
reflect who God really is and what he offers? Living in his light and staying
radically balanced is possible by keeping our attention on all three colors of
God. Moreover, by using all three colors of light (God) our mission work can
bring more lasting results. The missing blue refers to a dim incomplete light
where the blue spectrum representing the Holy Spirit is missing and thus the
picture of reality is distorted, Christian experience is one-sided, and our
mission is incomplete.
Throughout history, countless individuals have reported experiencing miraculous
healings and profound encounters with Jesus Christ in their dreams. These
encounters have profoundly impacted their lives, instilling them with renewed
faith, hope, and purpose. These encounters as spiritual experiences possess
transformative power. In this article, I will examine the fascinating realm of
healing through God-given dreams where Jesus Christ appears, brings solace,
guidance, and restoration to those in need.
The gospel of Mark highlights nine distinct healing miracles. Among them, five
involve the healing of demoniacs—individuals “possessed by demons,” or as some
may prefer, “demonized.” These accounts form a significant portion of Mark’s
healing narratives and are a notable theme in his Gospel, which is one of the
earliest records of Jesus’ life and ministry. These stories not only demonstrate
Jesus’ authority over evil spirits but also reflect his deep compassion for
those suffering from spiritual oppression.
The purpose of this article is twofold. First, it aims to highlight Jesus’
authority over evil spirits, as manifested in nature, animals, and people, and
explore its implications for us as his disciples, especially in the context of
spiritual warfare in the present age. Second, it seeks to underscore the
theological and missiological significance of the healings of these demoniacs
within the broader scope of Jesus’ mission on earth.
So often, African traditional approaches to health and wholeness are
misconstrued, scorned, dismissed, if not treated as passé. There are two
important entities—for the purposes of this article— which are diametrically at
odds to African traditional approaches to medicine. The first is Western
Medicine (WM), which because of its advances in medical, laboratory, and
pharmaceutical technology, tend to ignore African Traditional Medicine (ATM) as
archaic, superstitious, and non-scientific. The second is mainstream Christian
religion which (largely in the past), tended to see everything demonic in the
practice of African Traditional Medicine. But is it true that as far as ATM is
concerned, “nothing good can come from Nazareth?” Considering the fact that
Africans—including other indigenous communities the world over—from time
immemorial have used traditional medicine, could the assertions that it has been
of no medicinal and healing value be correct? How do we explain that the
Africans have continued to use this alternative to medicine, even in the era of
the most advanced medical technology? While these questions have been relegated
to medical anthropologists and other interested parties, it might be a good idea
to consider what their findings are. It may also be correct to say a closer look
at ATM might prompt a paradigm shift in the minds of those who have diminished
or completely dismissed ATM.
A major theme of both the Old and New Testaments is that of healing and
restoration. The Old Testament teaches that it is God who heals (Deut 32:39;
Exod 15:26), while the New Testament presents Jesus’ ministry as one of healing
and restoration (Luke 4:18-19). Healing was clearly a major theme in Christ’s
earthly ministry with biblical scholars reporting that approximately one fifth
of gospel texts relate stories of Christ’s healing miracles. The Bible teaches
that not only did Jesus heal but he gave his disciples the power and authority
to heal in his name, thus empowering the church to carry on his ministry of
healing.
This article addresses the trauma of Stalinism from the standpoint of a
missiological reading of Luke 4:16-21. This programmatic sermon of Jesus at
Nazareth, whose meaning is unfolded in the larger context of Luke-Acts, is of
primary importance for the current Russian culture, which is suffering from the
consequences of a time when its culture was warped by the forces of the demonic
realm. The rationale for using Luke-Acts in a post-Soviet theology of mission
and the cluster of theological theses that underlie Jesus’ program of liberation
are both foundational for a missiological paradigm intended for
post-totalitarian Russian society.
Ruqyah Shariah—Law-Compliant Exorcism or Islamic Healing Prayer— is a spiritual
and physical remedy that involves reciting qur’anic verses and authentic
supplications. Rooted deeply in Islamic tradition, it offers a wholistic
approach to healing and protection. Ruqyah has been a practice since the early
days of Islam, with numerous hadiths documenting its use by Muhammad and his
companions.
This article seeks to explore the multifaceted aspects of ruqyah shariah, by
examining its legal foundations, practical guidelines, and ethical implications,
while seeking to provide a well-rounded perspective on its significance and
application in the modern context.
In contemporary religious discourse, the concept of a church transcending its
traditional role as a mere congregation to become a dynamic center of influence
within its community has gained significant traction. This paradigm shift, often
fueled by a desire to engage with societal issues and impact lives beyond the
church walls, finds resonance in Timothy Keller’s Center Church: Doing Balanced,
Gospel-Centered Ministry in Your City. Grounded in theological depth and
practical wisdom, Keller presents a compelling framework for transforming
churches into vibrant hubs of influence capable of effecting meaningful change
in the world around them.
This two-part article aims to assess the missiological worldview theory
critically while pointing to implications for mission studies. It argues that
the concept needs serious development to be useful for research in contemporary
society. The social shifts experienced in the last decades and a lack of robust
missiological critical engagement have made the model theoretically unreliable
as an analytical tool. This first paper introduces the genealogy of
missiological worldview theory to expose its theoretical underpinnings and
identifies a departure between anthropology and missiology regarding the
concept. The first task in the ensuing discussion is to unearth the theoretical
foundations of the concept.